2006 Nissan 350Z vs. 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass
To start off, 2006 Nissan 350Z is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 3,790 cc (6 cylinders), 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Nissan 350Z weights approximately 60 kg more than 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass.
Because 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Nissan 350Z, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass has automatic transmission and 2006 Nissan 350Z has manual transmission. 2006 Nissan 350Z will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Nissan 350Z | 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass | |
Make | Nissan | Oldsmobile |
Model | 350Z | Cutlass |
Year Released | 2006 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3491 cc | 3790 cc |
Horse Power | 300 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1540 kg | 1480 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4320 mm | 5530 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2760 mm |