2006 Nissan 350Z vs. 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass
To start off, 2006 Nissan 350Z is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 3,491 cc, 2006 Nissan 350Z is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Nissan 350Z weights approximately 384 kg more than 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass.
Because 2006 Nissan 350Z is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Nissan 350Z. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Nissan 350Z | 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass | |
Make | Nissan | Oldsmobile |
Model | 350Z | Cutlass |
Year Released | 2006 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3491 cc | 2260 cc |
Horse Power | 300 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1710 kg | 1326 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4320 mm | 4850 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1780 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2680 mm |