2006 Nissan 350Z vs. 2009 Holden UTE
To start off, 2009 Holden UTE is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Nissan 350Z. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Nissan 350Z would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Holden UTE is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Nissan 350Z (300 HP) has 58 more horse power than 2009 Holden UTE. (242 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Nissan 350Z should accelerate faster than 2009 Holden UTE.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Nissan 350Z (353 Nm) has 23 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Holden UTE. (330 Nm). This means 2006 Nissan 350Z will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Holden UTE.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Nissan 350Z | 2009 Holden UTE | |
Make | Nissan | Holden |
Model | 350Z | UTE |
Year Released | 2006 | 2009 |
Body Type | Convertible | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3491 cc | 3600 cc |
Horse Power | 300 HP | 242 HP |
Torque | 353 Nm | 330 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |