2006 Nissan 350Z vs. 2012 Volvo C30
To start off, 2012 Volvo C30 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Nissan 350Z. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Nissan 350Z would be higher. At 3,491 cc, 2006 Nissan 350Z is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Volvo C30 weights approximately 199 kg more than 2006 Nissan 350Z.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Volvo C30 (400 Nm @ 1400 RPM) has 47 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Nissan 350Z. (353 Nm @ 4800 RPM). This means 2012 Volvo C30 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Nissan 350Z.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Nissan 350Z | 2012 Volvo C30 | |
Make | Nissan | Volvo |
Model | 350Z | C30 |
Year Released | 2006 | 2012 |
Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3491 cc | 2000 cc |
Horse Power | 300 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 353 Nm | 400 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4800 RPM | 1400 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1252 kg | 1451 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4320 mm | 4252 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1783 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1448 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2639 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 76 L | 60 L |