2006 Nissan Almera vs. 1974 Volvo 140
To start off, 2006 Nissan Almera is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Volvo 140. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Volvo 140 would be higher. At 2,127 cc (4 cylinders), 1974 Volvo 140 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1974 Volvo 140 (123 HP) has 15 more horse power than 2006 Nissan Almera. (108 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1974 Volvo 140 should accelerate faster than 2006 Nissan Almera.
Because 1974 Volvo 140 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1974 Volvo 140. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Nissan Almera, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1974 Volvo 140 (170 Nm) has 32 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Nissan Almera. (138 Nm). This means 1974 Volvo 140 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Nissan Almera.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Nissan Almera | 1974 Volvo 140 | |
| Make | Nissan | Volvo |
| Model | Almera | 140 |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1974 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1597 cc | 2127 cc |
| Horse Power | 108 HP | 123 HP |
| Torque | 138 Nm | 170 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 76.1 mm | 92 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 88 mm | 80 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 9.3:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4850 mm | 4900 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2620 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 60 L |
