2006 Nissan Almera vs. 2009 Nissan X-Trail
To start off, 2009 Nissan X-Trail is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Nissan Almera. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Nissan Almera would be higher. At 1,997 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Nissan X-Trail is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Nissan X-Trail (137 HP) has 29 more horse power than 2006 Nissan Almera. (108 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Nissan X-Trail should accelerate faster than 2006 Nissan Almera.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Nissan X-Trail (198 Nm) has 60 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Nissan Almera. (138 Nm). This means 2009 Nissan X-Trail will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Nissan Almera.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Nissan Almera | 2009 Nissan X-Trail | |
| Make | Nissan | Nissan |
| Model | Almera | X-Trail |
| Year Released | 2006 | 2009 |
| Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1597 cc | 1997 cc |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 108 HP | 137 HP |
| Torque | 138 Nm | 198 Nm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 10.0:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4850 mm | 4640 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1690 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2640 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.1 L/100km | 8.7 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 65 L |
