2006 Nissan Armada vs. 1968 TVR Tuscan
To start off, 2006 Nissan Armada is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 TVR Tuscan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 TVR Tuscan would be higher. At 5,555 cc, 2006 Nissan Armada is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Nissan Armada (305 HP @ 4900 RPM) has 76 more horse power than 1968 TVR Tuscan. (229 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Nissan Armada should accelerate faster than 1968 TVR Tuscan. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Nissan Armada weights approximately 1642 kg more than 1968 TVR Tuscan. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2006 Nissan Armada is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1968 TVR Tuscan. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Nissan Armada will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Nissan Armada | 1968 TVR Tuscan | |
| Make | Nissan | TVR |
| Model | Armada | Tuscan |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1968 |
| Body Type | SUV | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5555 cc | 4727 cc |
| Horse Power | 305 HP | 229 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4900 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 7 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2507 kg | 865 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5260 mm | 3710 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1730 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 2010 mm | 1260 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3140 mm | 2290 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 106 L | 65 L |
