2006 Nissan Armada vs. 2008 Peugeot 107
To start off, 2008 Peugeot 107 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Nissan Armada. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Nissan Armada would be higher. At 5,555 cc, 2006 Nissan Armada is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Nissan Armada weights approximately 700 kg more than 2008 Peugeot 107.
Because 2006 Nissan Armada is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2008 Peugeot 107. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Nissan Armada will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Nissan Armada (522 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 429 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Peugeot 107. (93 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2006 Nissan Armada will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Peugeot 107.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Nissan Armada | 2008 Peugeot 107 | |
| Make | Nissan | Peugeot |
| Model | Armada | 107 |
| Year Released | 2006 | 2008 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5555 cc | 998 cc |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 305 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 522 Nm | 93 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 3600 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.3:1 | 10.5:1 |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Number of Seats | 8 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1530 kg | 830 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5260 mm | 3440 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1640 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1980 mm | 1480 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3140 mm | 2350 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 15.7 L/100km | 4.6 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 106 L | 41 L |
