2006 Nissan Armada vs. 2009 Holden Epica
To start off, 2009 Holden Epica is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Nissan Armada. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Nissan Armada would be higher. At 5,555 cc, 2006 Nissan Armada is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Nissan Armada (305 HP) has 152 more horse power than 2009 Holden Epica. (153 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Nissan Armada should accelerate faster than 2009 Holden Epica.
Because 2006 Nissan Armada is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 Holden Epica. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Nissan Armada will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Nissan Armada (522 Nm) has 285 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Holden Epica. (237 Nm). This means 2006 Nissan Armada will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Holden Epica.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Nissan Armada | 2009 Holden Epica | |
| Make | Nissan | Holden |
| Model | Armada | Epica |
| Year Released | 2006 | 2009 |
| Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5555 cc | 2492 cc |
| Horse Power | 305 HP | 153 HP |
| Torque | 522 Nm | 237 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Number of Seats | 8 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 5260 mm | 4805 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1810 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1980 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3140 mm | 2700 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 15.7 L/100km | 9.3 L/100km |
