2006 Nissan Armada vs. 2010 Kia Cadenza
To start off, 2010 Kia Cadenza is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Nissan Armada. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Nissan Armada would be higher. At 5,555 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Nissan Armada is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Nissan Armada (305 HP) has 15 more horse power than 2010 Kia Cadenza. (290 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Nissan Armada should accelerate faster than 2010 Kia Cadenza. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Kia Cadenza weights approximately 35 kg more than 2006 Nissan Armada.
Because 2006 Nissan Armada is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2010 Kia Cadenza. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Nissan Armada will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Nissan Armada | 2010 Kia Cadenza | |
| Make | Nissan | Kia |
| Model | Armada | Cadenza |
| Year Released | 2006 | 2010 |
| Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5555 cc | 3500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 305 HP | 290 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Number of Seats | 8 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1540 kg | 1575 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5260 mm | 4965 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1850 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 2010 mm | 1475 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3140 mm | 2845 mm |
