2006 Nissan Armada vs. 2010 Toyota Venza
To start off, 2010 Toyota Venza is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Nissan Armada. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Nissan Armada would be higher. At 5,555 cc, 2006 Nissan Armada is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Nissan Armada (305 HP @ 4900 RPM) has 123 more horse power than 2010 Toyota Venza. (182 HP @ 5800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Nissan Armada should accelerate faster than 2010 Toyota Venza. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Toyota Venza weights approximately 176 kg more than 2006 Nissan Armada.
With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Nissan Armada (522 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 276 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Toyota Venza. (246 Nm @ 4200 RPM). This means 2006 Nissan Armada will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Toyota Venza.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Nissan Armada | 2010 Toyota Venza | |
Make | Nissan | Toyota |
Model | Armada | Venza |
Year Released | 2006 | 2010 |
Body Type | SUV | Crossover |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5555 cc | 2700 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 305 HP | 182 HP |
Engine RPM | 4900 RPM | 5800 RPM |
Torque | 522 Nm | 246 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | AWD |
Number of Seats | 8 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1530 kg | 1706 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5260 mm | 4801 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1905 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1980 mm | 1610 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3140 mm | 2776 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 12.4 L/100km | 8.7 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 18.1 L/100km | 11.2 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 106 L | 67 L |