2006 Nissan Armada vs. 2010 Volvo S60
To start off, 2010 Volvo S60 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Nissan Armada. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Nissan Armada would be higher. At 5,555 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Nissan Armada is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Nissan Armada (305 HP @ 4900 RPM) has 5 more horse power than 2010 Volvo S60. (300 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Nissan Armada should accelerate faster than 2010 Volvo S60. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Volvo S60 weights approximately 229 kg more than 2006 Nissan Armada.
With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Nissan Armada (522 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 82 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Volvo S60. (440 Nm @ 2100 RPM). This means 2006 Nissan Armada will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Volvo S60.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Nissan Armada | 2010 Volvo S60 | |
Make | Nissan | Volvo |
Model | Armada | S60 |
Year Released | 2006 | 2010 |
Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5555 cc | 3000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 305 HP | 300 HP |
Engine RPM | 4900 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 522 Nm | 440 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 2100 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | AWD |
Number of Seats | 8 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1540 kg | 1769 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5260 mm | 4623 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1864 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2010 mm | 1483 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3140 mm | 2776 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 13.1 L/100km | 9 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 18.1 L/100km | 13.1 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 106 L | 67 L |