2006 Nissan Armada vs. 2012 Audi R8
To start off, 2012 Audi R8 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Nissan Armada. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Nissan Armada would be higher. At 5,555 cc, 2006 Nissan Armada is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Audi R8 (420 HP) has 115 more horse power than 2006 Nissan Armada. (305 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Audi R8 should accelerate faster than 2006 Nissan Armada. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Nissan Armada weights approximately 872 kg more than 2012 Audi R8.
With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Nissan Armada (522 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 92 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Audi R8. (430 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2006 Nissan Armada will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Audi R8.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Nissan Armada | 2012 Audi R8 | |
Make | Nissan | Audi |
Model | Armada | R8 |
Year Released | 2006 | 2012 |
Body Type | SUV | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 5555 cc | 4200 cc |
Horse Power | 305 HP | 420 HP |
Torque | 522 Nm | 430 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | 4WD | AWD |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2507 kg | 1635 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5260 mm | 4435 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1930 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2010 mm | 1252 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3140 mm | 2649 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 13.1 L/100km | 11.8 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 18.1 L/100km | 21.4 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 106 L | 90 L |