2006 Nissan Armada vs. 2013 Dodge CHARGER
To start off, 2013 Dodge CHARGER is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Nissan Armada. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Nissan Armada would be higher. At 5,700 cc (8 cylinders), 2013 Dodge CHARGER is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Dodge CHARGER (365 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 60 more horse power than 2006 Nissan Armada. (305 HP @ 4900 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Dodge CHARGER should accelerate faster than 2006 Nissan Armada. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Nissan Armada weights approximately 578 kg more than 2013 Dodge CHARGER.
With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Dodge CHARGER (536 Nm @ 4200 RPM) has 14 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Nissan Armada. (522 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2013 Dodge CHARGER will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Nissan Armada.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Nissan Armada | 2013 Dodge CHARGER | |
Make | Nissan | Dodge |
Model | Armada | CHARGER |
Year Released | 2006 | 2013 |
Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5555 cc | 5700 cc |
Horse Power | 305 HP | 365 HP |
Engine RPM | 4900 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque | 522 Nm | 536 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | AWD |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2507 kg | 1929 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5260 mm | 5077 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1905 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2010 mm | 1482 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3140 mm | 3052 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 13.1 L/100km | 8 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 18.1 L/100km | 13.5 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 106 L | 72 L |