2006 Nissan Frontier vs. 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass
To start off, 2006 Nissan Frontier is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 3,950 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Nissan Frontier is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Nissan Frontier weights approximately 60 kg more than 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass.
Because 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Nissan Frontier, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Nissan Frontier | 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass | |
Make | Nissan | Oldsmobile |
Model | Frontier | Cutlass |
Year Released | 2006 | 1981 |
Body Type | Pickup | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3950 cc | 3790 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 265 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1540 kg | 1480 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5230 mm | 5030 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1790 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3200 mm | 2760 mm |