2006 Nissan Frontier vs. 1982 Nissan Pulsar
To start off, 2006 Nissan Frontier is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Nissan Pulsar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Nissan Pulsar would be higher. At 3,950 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Nissan Frontier is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Nissan Frontier (265 HP) has 195 more horse power than 1982 Nissan Pulsar. (70 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Nissan Frontier should accelerate faster than 1982 Nissan Pulsar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Nissan Frontier weights approximately 665 kg more than 1982 Nissan Pulsar. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Nissan Frontier (385 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 270 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Nissan Pulsar. (115 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2006 Nissan Frontier will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Nissan Pulsar.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Nissan Frontier | 1982 Nissan Pulsar | |
Make | Nissan | Nissan |
Model | Frontier | Pulsar |
Year Released | 2006 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3950 cc | 1488 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 265 HP | 70 HP |
Torque | 385 Nm | 115 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1530 kg | 865 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5230 mm | 3970 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1780 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3200 mm | 2420 mm |