2006 Nissan Frontier vs. 2012 Audi RS3
To start off, 2012 Audi RS3 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Nissan Frontier. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Nissan Frontier would be higher. At 3,950 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Nissan Frontier is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Audi RS3 (335 HP) has 70 more horse power than 2006 Nissan Frontier. (265 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Audi RS3 should accelerate faster than 2006 Nissan Frontier.
Because 2012 Audi RS3 is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2006 Nissan Frontier. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Audi RS3 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Audi RS3 (450 Nm @ 1600 RPM) has 64 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Nissan Frontier. (386 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2012 Audi RS3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Nissan Frontier.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Nissan Frontier | 2012 Audi RS3 | |
Make | Nissan | Audi |
Model | Frontier | RS3 |
Year Released | 2006 | 2012 |
Body Type | Pickup | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3950 cc | 2500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 265 HP | 335 HP |
Torque | 386 Nm | 450 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 1600 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | AWD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |