2006 Nissan Hardbody vs. 1971 TVR 2500
To start off, 2006 Nissan Hardbody is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1971 TVR 2500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1971 TVR 2500 would be higher. At 2,498 cc (6 cylinders), 1971 TVR 2500 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Nissan Hardbody (123 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 16 more horse power than 1971 TVR 2500. (107 HP @ 4900 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Nissan Hardbody should accelerate faster than 1971 TVR 2500.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Nissan Hardbody (174 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 14 more torque (in Nm) than 1971 TVR 2500. (160 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2006 Nissan Hardbody will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1971 TVR 2500.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Nissan Hardbody | 1971 TVR 2500 | |
Make | Nissan | TVR |
Model | Hardbody | 2500 |
Year Released | 2006 | 1971 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 2498 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 107 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4900 RPM |
Torque | 174 Nm | 160 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2290 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 90 L | 45 L |