2006 Nissan Hardbody vs. 2004 TVR Cerbera
To start off, 2006 Nissan Hardbody is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 TVR Cerbera. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 TVR Cerbera would be higher. At 4,185 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 TVR Cerbera is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 TVR Cerbera (346 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 223 more horse power than 2006 Nissan Hardbody. (123 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 TVR Cerbera should accelerate faster than 2006 Nissan Hardbody.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 TVR Cerbera (435 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 261 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Nissan Hardbody. (174 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2004 TVR Cerbera will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Nissan Hardbody.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Nissan Hardbody | 2004 TVR Cerbera | |
Make | Nissan | TVR |
Model | Hardbody | Cerbera |
Year Released | 2006 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 4185 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 346 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 174 Nm | 435 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Acceleration 0-100mph | 13.6 seconds | 4.7 seconds |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2580 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.7 L/100km | 13.5 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 90 L | 65 L |