2006 Nissan Interstar vs. 1980 Mazda Cosmo
To start off, 2006 Nissan Interstar is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Mazda Cosmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Mazda Cosmo would be higher. In terms of performance, 2006 Nissan Interstar (112 HP @ 3500 RPM) has 19 more horse power than 1980 Mazda Cosmo. (93 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Nissan Interstar should accelerate faster than 1980 Mazda Cosmo.
Let's talk about torque, 2006 Nissan Interstar (290 Nm @ 1600 RPM) has 139 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Mazda Cosmo. (151 Nm @ 3300 RPM). This means 2006 Nissan Interstar will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Mazda Cosmo. 1980 Mazda Cosmo has automatic transmission and 2006 Nissan Interstar has manual transmission. 2006 Nissan Interstar will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1980 Mazda Cosmo will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Nissan Interstar | 1980 Mazda Cosmo | |
| Make | Nissan | Mazda |
| Model | Interstar | Cosmo |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1980 |
| Horse Power | 112 HP | 93 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3500 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 290 Nm | 151 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 1600 RPM | 3300 RPM |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 3 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1690 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 580 mm | 2520 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 100 L | 65 L |
