2006 Nissan Lafesta vs. 2009 Tata Indica
To start off, 2009 Tata Indica is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Nissan Lafesta. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Nissan Lafesta would be higher.
Because 2006 Nissan Lafesta is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Nissan Lafesta. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Tata Indica, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2006 Nissan Lafesta has automatic transmission and 2009 Tata Indica has manual transmission. 2009 Tata Indica will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2006 Nissan Lafesta will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Nissan Lafesta | 2009 Tata Indica | |
| Make | Nissan | Tata |
| Model | Lafesta | Indica |
| Year Released | 2006 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 74 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
