2006 Nissan M vs. 1963 Reliant Sabre 4
To start off, 2006 Nissan M is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Reliant Sabre 4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Reliant Sabre 4 would be higher. At 4,500 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Nissan M is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1963 Reliant Sabre 4 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Reliant Sabre 4. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Nissan M, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Nissan M (462 Nm) has 339 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Reliant Sabre 4. (123 Nm). This means 2006 Nissan M will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Reliant Sabre 4.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Nissan M | 1963 Reliant Sabre 4 | |
| Make | Nissan | Reliant |
| Model | M | Sabre 4 |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1963 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4500 cc | 1703 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 70 HP |
| Torque | 462 Nm | 123 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1560 mm |
