2006 Nissan M vs. 1984 Toyota Century
To start off, 2006 Nissan M is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Toyota Century. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Toyota Century would be higher. At 4,500 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Nissan M is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1984 Toyota Century is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1984 Toyota Century. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Nissan M, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Nissan M (462 Nm) has 173 more torque (in Nm) than 1984 Toyota Century. (289 Nm). This means 2006 Nissan M will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1984 Toyota Century.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Nissan M | 1984 Toyota Century | |
| Make | Nissan | Toyota |
| Model | M | Century |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1984 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4500 cc | 3993 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 153 HP |
| Torque | 462 Nm | 289 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1900 mm |
