2006 Nissan Micra vs. 1967 Riley Kestrel
To start off, 2006 Nissan Micra is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Riley Kestrel. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Riley Kestrel would be higher. At 1,386 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Nissan Micra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Nissan Micra (87 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 30 more horse power than 1967 Riley Kestrel. (57 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Nissan Micra should accelerate faster than 1967 Riley Kestrel. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Nissan Micra weights approximately 615 kg more than 1967 Riley Kestrel. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Nissan Micra (128 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 34 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Riley Kestrel. (94 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2006 Nissan Micra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Riley Kestrel.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Nissan Micra | 1967 Riley Kestrel | |
Make | Nissan | Riley |
Model | Micra | Kestrel |
Year Released | 2006 | 1967 |
Engine Size | 1386 cc | 1275 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 87 HP | 57 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque | 128 Nm | 94 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1530 kg | 915 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4320 mm | 3730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2380 mm |