2006 Nissan Murano vs. 2011 Kia Cadenza
To start off, 2011 Kia Cadenza is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Nissan Murano. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Nissan Murano would be higher. At 3,507 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Nissan Murano is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Kia Cadenza (294 HP) has 49 more horse power than 2006 Nissan Murano. (245 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Kia Cadenza should accelerate faster than 2006 Nissan Murano. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Kia Cadenza weights approximately 35 kg more than 2006 Nissan Murano. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Nissan Murano | 2011 Kia Cadenza | |
Make | Nissan | Kia |
Model | Murano | Cadenza |
Year Released | 2006 | 2011 |
Body Type | Crossover | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3507 cc | 3300 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 245 HP | 294 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1540 kg | 1575 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 4965 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1850 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1700 mm | 1475 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2845 mm |