2006 Nissan Navara vs. 1981 Zastava 102
To start off, 2006 Nissan Navara is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Zastava 102. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Zastava 102 would be higher. At 3,954 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Nissan Navara is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Nissan Navara (265 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 212 more horse power than 1981 Zastava 102. (53 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Nissan Navara should accelerate faster than 1981 Zastava 102.
Because 2006 Nissan Navara is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Nissan Navara. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1981 Zastava 102, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Nissan Navara (386 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 308 more torque (in Nm) than 1981 Zastava 102. (78 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2006 Nissan Navara will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1981 Zastava 102.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Nissan Navara | 1981 Zastava 102 | |
Make | Nissan | Zastava |
Model | Navara | 102 |
Year Released | 2006 | 1981 |
Engine Size | 3954 cc | 1115 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 265 HP | 53 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 386 Nm | 78 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 5230 mm | 3500 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1890 mm | 1340 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3210 mm | 2160 mm |