2006 Nissan Sentra vs. 2000 Toyota Celica
To start off, 2006 Nissan Sentra is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Toyota Celica. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Toyota Celica would be higher. At 2,507 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Nissan Sentra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Nissan Sentra (165 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 91 more horse power than 2000 Toyota Celica. (74 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Nissan Sentra should accelerate faster than 2000 Toyota Celica.
Because 2000 Toyota Celica is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2006 Nissan Sentra. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Toyota Celica will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Toyota Celica (622 Nm) has 385 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Nissan Sentra. (237 Nm). This means 2000 Toyota Celica will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Nissan Sentra.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Nissan Sentra | 2000 Toyota Celica | |
Make | Nissan | Toyota |
Model | Sentra | Celica |
Year Released | 2006 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2507 cc | 1995 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 165 HP | 74 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Torque | 237 Nm | 622 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 8.5:1 |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4520 mm | 4450 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1280 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2440 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 87 L |