2006 Nissan Serena vs. 1964 Toyota Corona
To start off, 2006 Nissan Serena is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Toyota Corona. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Toyota Corona would be higher. At 1,997 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Nissan Serena is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1964 Toyota Corona is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Toyota Corona. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Nissan Serena, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2006 Nissan Serena has automatic transmission and 1964 Toyota Corona has manual transmission. 1964 Toyota Corona will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2006 Nissan Serena will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Nissan Serena | 1964 Toyota Corona | |
Make | Nissan | Toyota |
Model | Serena | Corona |
Year Released | 2006 | 1964 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1997 cc | 1453 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 83 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1670 mm |