2006 Nissan Titan vs. 2010 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2010 Ford Ecosport is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Nissan Titan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Nissan Titan would be higher. At 5,556 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Nissan Titan is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Nissan Titan (305 HP) has 162 more horse power than 2010 Ford Ecosport. (143 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Nissan Titan should accelerate faster than 2010 Ford Ecosport.
Because 2006 Nissan Titan is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2010 Ford Ecosport. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Nissan Titan will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2006 Nissan Titan has automatic transmission and 2010 Ford Ecosport has manual transmission. 2010 Ford Ecosport will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2006 Nissan Titan will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Nissan Titan | 2010 Ford Ecosport | |
Make | Nissan | Ford |
Model | Titan | Ecosport |
Year Released | 2006 | 2010 |
Body Type | Pickup | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5556 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 305 HP | 143 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5700 mm | 4228 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1980 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1910 mm | 1679 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3560 mm | 2490 mm |