2006 Nissan X-Trail vs. 1963 Suzuki Fronte
To start off, 2006 Nissan X-Trail is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Suzuki Fronte. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Suzuki Fronte would be higher. At 2,488 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Nissan X-Trail is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Nissan X-Trail (163 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 145 more horse power than 1963 Suzuki Fronte. (18 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Nissan X-Trail should accelerate faster than 1963 Suzuki Fronte. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Nissan X-Trail weights approximately 990 kg more than 1963 Suzuki Fronte. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2006 Nissan X-Trail (230 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 198 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Suzuki Fronte. (32 Nm @ 3700 RPM). This means 2006 Nissan X-Trail will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Suzuki Fronte.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Nissan X-Trail | 1963 Suzuki Fronte | |
| Make | Nissan | Suzuki |
| Model | X-Trail | Fronte |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1963 |
| Engine Size | 2488 cc | 358 cc |
| Horse Power | 163 HP | 18 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 230 Nm | 32 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3700 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1490 kg | 500 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4520 mm | 3000 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1300 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1680 mm | 1390 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2060 mm |
