2006 Nissan X-Trail vs. 2010 Audi TT

To start off, 2010 Audi TT is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Nissan X-Trail. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Nissan X-Trail would be higher. At 2,488 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Nissan X-Trail is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Audi TT (265 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 102 more horse power than 2006 Nissan X-Trail. (163 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Audi TT should accelerate faster than 2006 Nissan X-Trail. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Audi TT weights approximately 50 kg more than 2006 Nissan X-Trail. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Audi TT (349 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 119 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Nissan X-Trail. (230 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2010 Audi TT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Nissan X-Trail.

Compare all specifications:

2006 Nissan X-Trail 2010 Audi TT
Make Nissan Audi
Model X-Trail TT
Year Released 2006 2010
Body Type SUV Coupe
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2488 cc 2000 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 163 HP 265 HP
Engine RPM 6000 RPM 6000 RPM
Torque 230 Nm 349 Nm
Torque RPM 4000 RPM 2500 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline - Premium Gasoline
Drive Type 4WD AWD
Number of Seats 5 seats 4 seats
Number of Doors 5 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Weight 1490 kg 1540 kg
Vehicle Length 4520 mm 4199 mm
Vehicle Width 1770 mm 1842 mm
Vehicle Height 1680 mm 1351 mm
Wheelbase Size 2630 mm 2469 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 60 L 60 L