2006 Opel Antara vs. 1982 Toyota Celica
To start off, 2006 Opel Antara is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Toyota Celica. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Toyota Celica would be higher. At 1,986 cc (6 cylinders), 1982 Toyota Celica is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Opel Antara (212 HP @ 1400 RPM) has 97 more horse power than 1982 Toyota Celica. (115 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Opel Antara should accelerate faster than 1982 Toyota Celica.
Because 2006 Opel Antara is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Toyota Celica. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Opel Antara will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Opel Antara (542 Nm @ 1400 RPM) has 370 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Toyota Celica. (172 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 2006 Opel Antara will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Toyota Celica. 2006 Opel Antara has automatic transmission and 1982 Toyota Celica has manual transmission. 1982 Toyota Celica will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2006 Opel Antara will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Opel Antara | 1982 Toyota Celica | |
Make | Opel | Toyota |
Model | Antara | Celica |
Year Released | 2006 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1899 cc | 1986 cc |
Horse Power | 212 HP | 115 HP |
Engine RPM | 1400 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Torque | 542 Nm | 172 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1400 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1690 mm |