2006 Opel Antara vs. 2002 Rolls-Royce Park Ward
To start off, 2006 Opel Antara is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Rolls-Royce Park Ward. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Rolls-Royce Park Ward would be higher. At 5,377 cc (12 cylinders), 2002 Rolls-Royce Park Ward is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Rolls-Royce Park Ward (322 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 110 more horse power than 2006 Opel Antara. (212 HP @ 1400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Rolls-Royce Park Ward should accelerate faster than 2006 Opel Antara.
Because 2006 Opel Antara is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2002 Rolls-Royce Park Ward. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Opel Antara will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Opel Antara (542 Nm @ 1400 RPM) has 43 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Rolls-Royce Park Ward. (499 Nm @ 3900 RPM). This means 2006 Opel Antara will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Rolls-Royce Park Ward.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Opel Antara | 2002 Rolls-Royce Park Ward | |
Make | Opel | Rolls-Royce |
Model | Antara | Park Ward |
Year Released | 2006 | 2002 |
Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1899 cc | 5377 cc |
Horse Power | 212 HP | 322 HP |
Engine RPM | 1400 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 542 Nm | 499 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1400 RPM | 3900 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Top Speed | 210 km/hour | 220 km/hour |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1940 mm |