2006 Opel Astra vs. 1963 Ford Zodiac
To start off, 2006 Opel Astra is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Ford Zodiac. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Ford Zodiac would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Opel Astra weights approximately 8 kg more than 1963 Ford Zodiac.
Because 1963 Ford Zodiac is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Ford Zodiac. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Opel Astra, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Opel Astra | 1963 Ford Zodiac | |
| Make | Opel | Ford |
| Model | Astra | Zodiac |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1963 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 108 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1278 kg | 1270 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4300 mm | 4650 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1770 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2780 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 52 L | 45 L |
