2006 Opel Astra vs. 1981 Mazda Cosmo
To start off, 2006 Opel Astra is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Mazda Cosmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Mazda Cosmo would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1981 Mazda Cosmo weights approximately 170 kg more than 2006 Opel Astra.
Because 1981 Mazda Cosmo is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1981 Mazda Cosmo. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Opel Astra, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Opel Astra | 1981 Mazda Cosmo | |
Make | Opel | Mazda |
Model | Astra | Cosmo |
Year Released | 2006 | 1981 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 120 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 980 kg | 1150 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4300 mm | 4670 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2620 mm |