2006 Opel Astra vs. 2002 Volvo XC90
To start off, 2006 Opel Astra is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Volvo XC90. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Volvo XC90 would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Volvo XC90 weights approximately 719 kg more than 2006 Opel Astra.
Because 2002 Volvo XC90 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2006 Opel Astra. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Volvo XC90 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Opel Astra | 2002 Volvo XC90 | |
| Make | Opel | Volvo |
| Model | Astra | XC90 |
| Year Released | 2006 | 2002 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 160 HP |
| Top Speed | 182 km/hour | 185 km/hour |
| Acceleration 0-100mph | 12.5 seconds | 12.3 seconds |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 7 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1395 kg | 2114 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4300 mm | 4800 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1900 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1790 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2800 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 5.2 L/100km | 9.1 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 52 L | 72 L |
