2006 Opel Astra vs. 2010 Mazda BT-50
To start off, 2010 Mazda BT-50 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Opel Astra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Opel Astra would be higher.
Because 2010 Mazda BT-50 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2006 Opel Astra. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Mazda BT-50 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Opel Astra | 2010 Mazda BT-50 | |
| Make | Opel | Mazda |
| Model | Astra | BT-50 |
| Year Released | 2006 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 154 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1810 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 3010 mm |
