2006 Opel Meriva vs. 1949 Simca Type 11 Monoplace
To start off, 2006 Opel Meriva is newer by 57 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Simca Type 11 Monoplace. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Simca Type 11 Monoplace would be higher. At 1,387 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Opel Meriva is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Opel Meriva (89 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 17 more horse power than 1949 Simca Type 11 Monoplace. (72 HP @ 5800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Opel Meriva should accelerate faster than 1949 Simca Type 11 Monoplace.
Because 1949 Simca Type 11 Monoplace is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1949 Simca Type 11 Monoplace. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Opel Meriva, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Opel Meriva | 1949 Simca Type 11 Monoplace | |
| Make | Opel | Simca |
| Model | Meriva | Type 11 Monoplace |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1949 |
| Engine Size | 1387 cc | 1220 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 89 HP | 72 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 4050 mm | 3130 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1350 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2640 mm | 2250 mm |
