2006 Opel Meriva vs. 1965 Riley Kestrel
To start off, 2006 Opel Meriva is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Riley Kestrel. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Riley Kestrel would be higher. At 1,686 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Opel Meriva is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Opel Meriva (99 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 46 more horse power than 1965 Riley Kestrel. (53 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Opel Meriva should accelerate faster than 1965 Riley Kestrel. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Opel Meriva weights approximately 508 kg more than 1965 Riley Kestrel. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Opel Meriva (240 Nm @ 2300 RPM) has 156 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Riley Kestrel. (84 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2006 Opel Meriva will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Riley Kestrel.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Opel Meriva | 1965 Riley Kestrel | |
Make | Opel | Riley |
Model | Meriva | Kestrel |
Year Released | 2006 | 1965 |
Engine Size | 1686 cc | 1098 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 99 HP | 53 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 240 Nm | 84 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2300 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1393 kg | 885 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4050 mm | 3730 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1540 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1630 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2640 mm | 2380 mm |