2006 Opel Tigra vs. 2012 Suzuki Equator

To start off, 2012 Suzuki Equator is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Opel Tigra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Opel Tigra would be higher. At 2,501 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Suzuki Equator is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Suzuki Equator (150 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 81 more horse power than 2006 Opel Tigra. (69 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Suzuki Equator should accelerate faster than 2006 Opel Tigra. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Opel Tigra weights approximately 290 kg more than 2012 Suzuki Equator.

Because 2012 Suzuki Equator is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2012 Suzuki Equator. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Opel Tigra, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Suzuki Equator (171 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 1 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Opel Tigra. (170 Nm @ 1750 RPM). This means 2012 Suzuki Equator will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Opel Tigra. 2012 Suzuki Equator has automatic transmission and 2006 Opel Tigra has manual transmission. 2006 Opel Tigra will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2012 Suzuki Equator will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

2006 Opel Tigra 2012 Suzuki Equator
Make Opel Suzuki
Model Tigra Equator
Year Released 2006 2012
Body Type Convertible Pickup
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1246 cc 2501 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 69 HP 150 HP
Engine RPM 4000 RPM 5600 RPM
Torque 170 Nm 171 Nm
Torque RPM 1750 RPM 4000 RPM
Engine Compression Ratio 18.0:1 9.5:1
Fuel Type Gasoline - Premium Gasoline
Drive Type Front Rear
Transmission Type Manual Automatic
Number of Doors 2 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 1265 kg 975 kg
Vehicle Length 3930 mm 5250 mm
Vehicle Width 1690 mm 1860 mm
Vehicle Height 1370 mm 1790 mm
Wheelbase Size 2500 mm 3200 mm
Fuel Consumption Overall 4.6 L/100km 7.2 L/100km
Fuel Tank Capacity 45 L 80 L


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]