2006 Opel Zafira vs. 1972 Datsun 240Z
To start off, 2006 Opel Zafira is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Datsun 240Z. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Datsun 240Z would be higher. At 2,393 cc (6 cylinders), 1972 Datsun 240Z is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Opel Zafira weights approximately 325 kg more than 1972 Datsun 240Z.
Because 1972 Datsun 240Z is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1972 Datsun 240Z. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Opel Zafira, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Opel Zafira | 1972 Datsun 240Z | |
Make | Opel | Datsun |
Model | Zafira | 240Z |
Year Released | 2006 | 1972 |
Body Type | Minivan | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1598 cc | 2393 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 151 HP |
Top Speed | 176 km/hour | 201 km/hour |
Acceleration 0-100mph | 13 seconds | 8 seconds |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1393 kg | 1068 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4320 mm | 4140 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1630 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2300 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 7.5 L/100km | 11 L/100km |