2006 Opel Zafira vs. 2013 Cadillac CTS-V
To start off, 2013 Cadillac CTS-V is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Opel Zafira. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Opel Zafira would be higher. At 6,200 cc (8 cylinders), 2013 Cadillac CTS-V is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Cadillac CTS-V weights approximately 366 kg more than 2006 Opel Zafira.
Because 2013 Cadillac CTS-V is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2013 Cadillac CTS-V. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Opel Zafira, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Opel Zafira | 2013 Cadillac CTS-V | |
Make | Opel | Cadillac |
Model | Zafira | CTS-V |
Year Released | 2006 | 2013 |
Body Type | Minivan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1910 cc | 6200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 548 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1628 kg | 1994 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4470 mm | 4877 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1884 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1650 mm | 1422 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2880 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 5.2 L/100km | 14.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 58 L | 68 L |