2006 Opel Zafira vs. 2013 Cadillac SRX
To start off, 2013 Cadillac SRX is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Opel Zafira. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Opel Zafira would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Cadillac SRX is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Cadillac SRX weights approximately 1127 kg more than 2006 Opel Zafira.
Because 2013 Cadillac SRX is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2006 Opel Zafira. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Cadillac SRX will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Opel Zafira | 2013 Cadillac SRX | |
| Make | Opel | Cadillac |
| Model | Zafira | SRX |
| Year Released | 2006 | 2013 |
| Body Type | Minivan | Crossover |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1598 cc | 3600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 304 HP |
| Acceleration 0-100mph | 13 seconds | 9.7 seconds |
| Drive Type | Front | AWD |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1393 kg | 2520 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4320 mm | 4834 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1910 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1640 mm | 1669 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2807 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 7.5 L/100km | 13 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 58 L | 80 L |
