2006 Peugeot 107 vs. 2012 Mazda 3
To start off, 2012 Mazda 3 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Peugeot 107. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Peugeot 107 would be higher. At 2,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Mazda 3 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2006 Peugeot 107 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Peugeot 107. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Mazda 3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2006 Peugeot 107 has automatic transmission and 2012 Mazda 3 has manual transmission. 2012 Mazda 3 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2006 Peugeot 107 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Peugeot 107 | 2012 Mazda 3 | |
Make | Peugeot | Mazda |
Model | 107 | 3 |
Year Released | 2006 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 998 cc | 2000 cc |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 148 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 5-speed manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1755 mm |