2006 Peugeot 206 vs. 2009 Acura CSX
To start off, 2009 Acura CSX is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Peugeot 206. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Peugeot 206 would be higher. At 2,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Acura CSX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Acura CSX (197 HP) has 110 more horse power than 2006 Peugeot 206. (87 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Acura CSX should accelerate faster than 2006 Peugeot 206. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Acura CSX weights approximately 359 kg more than 2006 Peugeot 206. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Peugeot 206 | 2009 Acura CSX | |
Make | Peugeot | Acura |
Model | 206 | CSX |
Year Released | 2006 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1360 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 87 HP | 197 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 954 kg | 1313 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3830 mm | 4544 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1752 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1435 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 4.9 L/100km | 6.8 L/100km |