2006 Peugeot 207 vs. 1965 Renault 8
To start off, 2006 Peugeot 207 is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Renault 8. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Renault 8 would be higher. At 1,360 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Peugeot 207 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Peugeot 207 (88 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 41 more horse power than 1965 Renault 8. (47 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Peugeot 207 should accelerate faster than 1965 Renault 8.
Because 1965 Renault 8 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Renault 8. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Peugeot 207, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Peugeot 207 | 1965 Renault 8 | |
Make | Peugeot | Renault |
Model | 207 | 8 |
Year Released | 2006 | 1965 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 1360 cc | 955 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 88 HP | 47 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4210 mm | 4000 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1500 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1520 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2280 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 38 L |