2006 Peugeot 207 vs. 1978 Volvo 164
To start off, 2006 Peugeot 207 is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Volvo 164. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Volvo 164 would be higher. At 2,998 cc (6 cylinders), 1978 Volvo 164 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1978 Volvo 164 (138 HP) has 71 more horse power than 2006 Peugeot 207. (67 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1978 Volvo 164 should accelerate faster than 2006 Peugeot 207.
Because 1978 Volvo 164 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1978 Volvo 164. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Peugeot 207, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1978 Volvo 164 (204 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 44 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Peugeot 207. (160 Nm @ 3250 RPM). This means 1978 Volvo 164 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Peugeot 207.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Peugeot 207 | 1978 Volvo 164 | |
Make | Peugeot | Volvo |
Model | 207 | 164 |
Year Released | 2006 | 1978 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1358 cc | 2998 cc |
Horse Power | 67 HP | 138 HP |
Torque | 160 Nm | 204 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3250 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1720 mm |