2006 Peugeot 207 vs. 1980 Zastava 1500
To start off, 2006 Peugeot 207 is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Zastava 1500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Zastava 1500 would be higher. At 1,479 cc (4 cylinders), 1980 Zastava 1500 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Peugeot 207 (88 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 14 more horse power than 1980 Zastava 1500. (74 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Peugeot 207 should accelerate faster than 1980 Zastava 1500.
Because 1980 Zastava 1500 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1980 Zastava 1500. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Peugeot 207, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Peugeot 207 (133 Nm @ 3250 RPM) has 20 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Zastava 1500. (113 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2006 Peugeot 207 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Zastava 1500.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Peugeot 207 | 1980 Zastava 1500 | |
Make | Peugeot | Zastava |
Model | 207 | 1500 |
Year Released | 2006 | 1980 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1360 cc | 1479 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 88 HP | 74 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Torque | 133 Nm | 113 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3250 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4210 mm | 4050 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1520 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2430 mm |