2006 Peugeot 407 vs. 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee
To start off, 2006 Peugeot 407 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee would be higher. At 3,966 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee (195 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 61 more horse power than 2006 Peugeot 407. (134 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee should accelerate faster than 2006 Peugeot 407. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee weights approximately 240 kg more than 2006 Peugeot 407. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee (312 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 122 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Peugeot 407. (190 Nm @ 4100 RPM). This means 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Peugeot 407.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Peugeot 407 | 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee | |
Make | Peugeot | Jeep |
Model | 407 | Grand Cherokee |
Year Released | 2006 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1997 cc | 3966 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 134 HP | 195 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Torque | 190 Nm | 312 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4100 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.9:1 | 8.8:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1560 kg | 1800 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 4610 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1770 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 8.2 L/100km | 13.1 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 66 L | 78 L |