2006 Peugeot 807 vs. 1964 Triumph 2000
To start off, 2006 Peugeot 807 is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (6 cylinders), 1964 Triumph 2000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Peugeot 807 (106 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 17 more horse power than 1964 Triumph 2000. (89 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Peugeot 807 should accelerate faster than 1964 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Peugeot 807 weights approximately 573 kg more than 1964 Triumph 2000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2006 Peugeot 807 (270 Nm @ 1750 RPM) has 112 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Triumph 2000. (158 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2006 Peugeot 807 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Peugeot 807 | 1964 Triumph 2000 | |
Make | Peugeot | Triumph |
Model | 807 | 2000 |
Year Released | 2006 | 1964 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1996 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 106 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 270 Nm | 158 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1750 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 85 mm | 74.7 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 88 mm | 76 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 17.3:1 | 9.3:1 |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1743 kg | 1170 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4730 mm | 4420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 80 L | 64 L |